Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. Mayhall & Neible

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• viewing Williams, a fractured plurality opinion, “with caution” as “Williams cannot be fairly read to supplant the ‘primary purpose’ test previously endorsed by the Court”
• “it may be fairly said that the issue of whether and to what extent an expert may rely upon and/or then disclose (even with a limiting instruction) as a predicate fact, testimonial hearsay, is unanswered by Williams”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).