Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. S. S. McClure Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a 5 Both Defendant Keeley and Plaintiffs cite to Meyers to support their respective arguments (see Doc. 131 at p. 3; Doc. 132 at p. 7
• “Dr. Mulconrey is not a retained expert. Accordingly, under the plain language of the Rule, the expert falls within the disclosure requirements of subsection (a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(C), but not the reporting requirements of subsection (a)(2)(B).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).