Union Railroad v. Southern Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that lack of additional evidence admissible only to further impeach victim did not prejudice outcome
• requiring a defendant seeking a new trial to prove that the new evidence “is of such a character that a different result will probably be reached upon another trial”
• “[T]he verdict demonstrates that the jury considered each charge separately.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).