· 9/30/1994
Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Citations
- 882 P.2d 212
- 1994 Wyo. LEXIS 111
- 1994 WL 527679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the Act provides a “comprehensive regulatory program which prevents the waste of Wyoming’s oil and gas resources and protects the correlative rights of property owners.”
- determining an operating agreement’s recital discloses the parties’ “express acknowledgment . . .”, recital “conclusively establishes that the parties formed [the] agreement . . .”
- “Except for the due process 1 DSUs2 for the production of hydrocarbons from the Lance Pool in the Jonah Field. The application in Docket No. 1902-2018 (hereinafter 1902
- words in contract must be given their “plain meaning”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Golden, Thomas, Cardine, MacY, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.