Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.

Citations

  • 882 P.2d 212
  • 1994 Wyo. LEXIS 111
  • 1994 WL 527679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the Act provides a “comprehensive regulatory program which prevents the waste of Wyoming’s oil and gas resources and protects the correlative rights of property owners.”
  • determining an operating agreement’s recital discloses the parties’ “express acknowledgment . . .”, recital “conclusively establishes that the parties formed [the] agreement . . .”
  • “Except for the due process 1 DSUs2 for the production of hydrocarbons from the Lance Pool in the Jonah Field. The application in Docket No. 1902-2018 (hereinafter 1902
  • words in contract must be given their “plain meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Golden, Thomas, Cardine, MacY, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.