Skip to main content
· 11/15/1895

Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Eddy

Citations

  • 2 Kan. App. 291
  • 42 P. 413
  • 1895 Kan. App. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming 2 Cal. App. at 825 (holding public entity providing sidewalks and curbs to citizens acts as public servant, 3 not commercial enterprise); Hart v. Cult Awareness Network, 13 Cal. App. 4th 777, 792–93 (1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.