Union Pacific Railroad v. Snow

Citations

• 231 U.S. 204
• 34 S. Ct. 104
• 58 L. Ed. 184
• 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2558

Syllabus

<p>Courts will not enforce a literal interpretation of a statute if antecedent rights are affected or human conduct given a consequence the statute did not intend.</p> <p>Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Laramie Stock Yards, ante, p. 190, followed to effect that the act of June 24,1912, c. 181,37 Stat. 138, permitting state statutes of limitation to apply to adverse possession of portions of the right of way granted to railroads under the act of July 1, 1862, did not have retroactive effect.</p> <p>Courts are repelled from giving such a construction to a statute as will raise grave doubts of its legality as well as of its justice.</p> <p>The act of June 24, 1912, did not amount to a forfeiture of that part of the right of way granted under the act of July 1, 1862, not actually occupied by the railroads; quaere whether such a construction of the act of 1912 would not render it illegal.</p>