Union Pacific Railroad v. Minnesota Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Railroads and the State agree that for 3 At the hearing on the motion, the Association’s counsel suggested that the Court could “simply take judicial notice that [ships, barges, and trains] are all competing modes of freight transportation.” Hr’g Tr. (Oct. 2, 2024) 10:11–17 (Doc. 69

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).