Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Reilly Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding non-compliance with the NCP where, at the time of one public meeting, the “remedy was-for purposes of allowing meaningful public participation and comment-a foregone conclusion”
• plaintiff failed to “substantially comply” with NCP when it failed to provide meaningful opportunity for public participation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).