Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Plano Molding Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that legal argument under contract law supported by no citation to applicable authority was underdeveloped
• “When expert testimony has been admitted under Daubert, the soundness of the factual underpinnings of the expert’s analysis and the correctness of the expert’s conclusions based on that analysis are factual matters to be determined by the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).