Skip to main content
· 3/17/2020

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding under either de novo or abuse of discretion standards of review, the trial court did not err in enforcing the forum selection clause
  • holding under either de novo or abuse of discretion standards of review, the trial court did not err in enforcing the forum selection clause
  • concluding the burden of proof was not met, regardless of the standard of review
  • concluding the burden of proof was not met, regardless of the standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.