Skip to main content
· 7/19/2000

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brent Mower

Citations

  • 219 F.3d 1069
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5989
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7935
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1128
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17256
  • 2000 WL 986926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding state statute imposing duty of confidentiality could have been source of defendant's obligation to his former employer
  • calling the privilege “novel,” and noting that the Ninth Circuit has not recognized the privilege
  • “[O]ne basic principle built into Rule 65 7 is that those against whom an injunction is issued should receive fair and precisely drawn 8 notice of what the injunction actually prohibits.”
  • “This court has not recognized this novel privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Graber, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.