Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state's safety regulation governing use of couplers-a safety appliance specifically listed in the SAA's statutory language-was preempted by the SAA
• rejecting a ripeness objection in a case challenging the imposition of train regulations as unconstitutional “because it is clear that any standard required” by the regulations would be unconstitutional
• not essentially local safety hazard because a “steep grade/sharp curve combination can be adequately addressed by national standards”
• not essentially local safety hazard because a \steep grade/sharp curve combination can be adequately addressed by national standards\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).