Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gunderson Rail Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• first citing Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, N.C., 470 U.S. 564, 574, 105 S.Ct 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985) (when there are “two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).