Union Pac. RR Co. v. INTERMOUNTAIN FARMERS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the intent of the parties governs indemnity agreements against negligence, \the presumption is against any such intention and it is not achieved by inference from general language\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Evans Construction Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-06-24· cited 61×
• Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-04-22· cited 56×
• Union Pacific Railroad v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1965-12-15· cited 37×
• Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. First Security Corp.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1959-08-03· cited 28×
• Barrus v. Wilkinson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1965-01-15· cited 27×
• Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Chicago Packaged Fuel Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1950-09-11· cited 24×
• Jensen's Used Cars v. Rice
  Utah Supreme Court· 1958-03-28· cited 17×
• Kidman v. White
  Utah Supreme Court· 1963-02-20· cited 13×
• HOWE RENTS CORPORATION v. Worthen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1966-12-09· cited 13×
• Cornwall v. Willow Creek Country Club
  Utah Supreme Court· 1962-03-22· cited 12×
• Union Pacific Railroad v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'n
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 9×