Skip to main content
· 11/1/1976

Union Oil Company of California v. Federal Power Commission

Citations

  • 542 F.2d 1036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we view the substantial evidence standard as allowing greater scrutiny than the arbitrary and capricious standard
  • explaining that we view the substantial evidence standard as allowing greater scrutiny than the arbitrary and capricious standard
  • language, subsequently withdrawn as premature, to the effect that FOIA exemptions mandate nondisclosure
  • language, subsequently withdrawn as premature, to the effect that FOIA exemptions mandate nondisclosure
  • action under FOIA for protection of information concerning natural gas reserves

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duniway, Goodwin, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.