· 11/1/1976
Union Oil Company of California v. Federal Power Commission
Citations
- 542 F.2d 1036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we view the substantial evidence standard as allowing greater scrutiny than the arbitrary and capricious standard
- explaining that we view the substantial evidence standard as allowing greater scrutiny than the arbitrary and capricious standard
- language, subsequently withdrawn as premature, to the effect that FOIA exemptions mandate nondisclosure
- language, subsequently withdrawn as premature, to the effect that FOIA exemptions mandate nondisclosure
- action under FOIA for protection of information concerning natural gas reserves
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duniway, Goodwin, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.