Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting “arising out of’ to require less than proximate cause, but more than a tenuous causal connection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Faber v. Roelofs
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-01-14· cited 69×
• Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-05-06· cited 22×
• Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia Insurance
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-03-05· cited 15×
• Westfield Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-05-12· cited 11×
• Rosebrooks v. National General Insurance
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-04-30· cited 11×
• Cannon v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-03-25· cited 10×
• Allstate Insurance v. Crouch
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-10-27· cited 6×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carter v. Bergeron
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1960-04-29· cited 29×
• Eastern Transportation Co. v. Liberty Mutual Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1958-10-07· cited 6×