Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Mulligan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ordinance that restricted sale of 9 flavored tobacco near schools was not preempted by the FSPTCA
• holding that ordinance that restricted sale of 21 flavored tobacco near schools was not preempted by the FSPTCA
• Chicago’s flavored tobacco ordinance “[did] not regulate activities that implicate constitutional rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).