Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Lakeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the context of whether a website’s look and feel were distinctive, “Evidence of deliberate copying is relevant to a determination of secondary meaning,’ and ‘in appropriate circumstances, deliberate copying may suffice to support an inference of secondary meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).