Skip to main content
· 9/5/1923

Union Iron Works v. Gray & Son

Citations

  • 126 Wash. 290
  • 218 P. 8
  • 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1148

Syllabus

<p>Sales (159, 165) — Set-off in Action fob Pbice — Damages Not Contemplated. Upon a sale of mill machinery, the purchaser cannot claim a set-off for delay, which caused an added expense of re-handling logs on account of the small capacity of the mill pond, where the seller was not informed of this situation.</p> <p>Same (159, 165). Upon a sale of mill machinery, the purchaser cannot claim a set-off for delay causing the loss of ■ contemplated profits upon a certain contract to supply timber, which contract was filled after the mill resumed operations.</p>

Judges: Touvian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.