Skip to main content
· 6/10/1926

Union Iron Works Co. v. Sturgis

Citations

  • 14 F.2d 256
  • 56 App. D.C. 364
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an order nunc pro tunc is an “equitable remedy traditionally used to apply to a court’s own order or judgment retroactively”
  • noting that nunc pro tunc relief has been applied to embrace agency action “where necessary to put the victim of agency error in the economic position it would have occupied but for the error” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “[Ojn November 30, 1993, EPA found that MMT did not ‘cause or contribute’ to the failure of emissions controls systems — the sole criterion for granting a[] waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.