Union Indemnity Co. v. S. N. Kleier Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failure to comport with the necessary ORCP 68 procedures required a reversal of the attorney fee award, even where the court may otherwise have had sufficient information to award fees
• noting that the process outlined in ORCP 68 is mandatory
• “The procedure mandated in ORCP 68 C(4) is a right of the par- ties, not just a convenience for the court.”
• “[W]hether the trial court erred in failing to follow the procedure of ORCP 68 is a question of law.”
• “[W]hether the trial court erred in failing to follow the pro- cedure of ORCP 68 is a question of law.”
• court erred in awarding attorney fees without holding a hearing pursuant to ORCP 68 C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).