Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a person may revoke the implied license but must do so expressly (quoting Taylor, 458 F.3d at 1204)
• holding that a person may revoke the implied license but must do so expressly (quoting Taylor, 458 F.3d at 1204)
• holding that, “in the absence of another barrier (such as a fence and gate), ‘No Trespassing’ signs do not, in and of themselves, withdraw the implied consent to conduct a knock and talk”
• holding that, “in the absence of another -13- barrier (such as a fence and gate), „No Trespassing‟ signs do not, in and of themselves, withdraw the implied consent to conduct a knock and talk”
• noting that other courts have required that the revocation of the implied license be accomplished by clear demonstrations that are unambiguous and obvious to the casual visitor
• noting that other courts have required that the revocation of the implied license be accomplished by clear demonstrations that are unambiguous and obvious to the casual visitor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).