Skip to main content
· 3/27/1905

Union Compress Co. v. Leffler & Son

Citations

  • 122 Ga. 640
  • 50 S.E. 483
  • 1905 Ga. LEXIS 287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the prevailing party as prevailing on the “central claims 4 advanced” and receiving “substantial relief in consequence thereof”
  • “To be considered a ‘prevailing party,’ one must simply prevail on the 26 central claims advanced, and receive substantial relief in consequence thereof.”
  • prevailing plaintiff had received $75,000, plus interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.