Skip to main content
· 9/14/1971

Union Central Life Insurance v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 448 F.2d 501
  • 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2849
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • there is no “precedent for the proposition that a private cause of action exists to remedy a violation of [a] HUD regulation”
  • there is no “precedent for the proposition that a private cause of action exists to remedy a violation of [a] HUD regulation.”
  • joinder of HUD desirable so that HUD could explain one of its regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.