Skip to main content
· 12/9/1904

Union Central Life Ins. v. Spinks

Citations

  • 119 Ky. 261
  • 26 Ky. L. Rptr. 1205
  • 83 S.W. 615
  • 1904 Ky. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that language that “only provide[s] additional descriptions of the single claimed functional element” is not a separate element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paynter, Rear

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.