Union Carbide Corp. v. Brenner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no questions of individualized consent” where defendant purchased list of 16,000 fax numbers from InfoUSA and hired another third-party, B2B, and “presented no evidence that it had established business relationships with any” of the recipients
• “Under the TCPA, each individual plaintiff is unlikely to recover 3 more than a small amount (the greater of actual monetary loss or $500
• court found attorneys from Bock & Hatch and Anderson + Wanca adequate after reviewing prior cases of alleged impropriety and stating that the defendant had not “allege[d] improper conduct in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).