Skip to main content
· 7/10/1996

Union Bankers Insurance Co. v. Hatin

Citations

  • 677 So. 2d 374
  • 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7146
  • 1996 WL 382357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, until a trial court rules on a matter, a petition for the writ of mandamus is premature
  • holding that a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to set aside a purported denial by operation of law of a Rule 60(b) motion was premature because the trial court had not yet ruled on the motion
  • holding that a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to set aside a purported denial by operation of law of a Rule 60(b) motion was premature because the trial court had not yet ruled on the motion
  • holding that, because a parent’s Rule 60(b
  • explaining that an appeal lies from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion and that a petitioner would not be entitled to a writ of mandamus because he or she would have an adequate remedy at law
  • declining to grant a petition for the writ of mandamus when the trial court had yet to rule on a pending Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Fletcher, Levy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.