Skip to main content
· 5/19/1890

Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City Bank

Citations

  • 136 U.S. 223
  • 10 S. Ct. 1013
  • 34 L. Ed. 341
  • 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2208

Syllabus

<p>Upon appeal from a decree in equity of the Circuit Court of the United States, accompanied by a certificate of division in opinion between two judges before whom the hearing was had, in a case in which the amount in dispute is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction, its jurisdiction is confined to answering the questions of law certified.</p> <p>Upon the question of the construction and effectof a statute of a State, regulating assignments for the benefit of creditors, the decisions of the highest court of the State are of controlling authority in the courts of the United States.</p> <p>Section 354 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri of 1879, concerning voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors, does not invalidate a deed of trust, in the nature of a mortgage, by an insolvent debtor, of all his personal property, to secure the payment of preferred debts, reserving a right of redemption.</p> <p>By .the law of Missouri, one partner has power to bind his copartners by a mortgage of all the personal property of the partnership to secure the payment of particular debts of the partnership.</p> <p>A receiver derives his authority from the act of the court, and not from the act of the parties; and the effect of his appointment is to put the property from that time into his custody as an officer of the court, for the benefit of the party ultimately proved to be entitled, but not to change the title, or even the right of possession.</p> <p>By the law of Missouri, a mortgage by one partner of the personal property of an insolvent partnership, to secure the payment of particular debts of the partnership, is valid, and does not operate as a duntary assignment for the benefit of all its creditors under § 354 of tne Revised Statutes of 1879; although another partner does not assent to the mortgage, and has previously authorized the making of a voluntary assignment under the statute; and although the partner making the mortgage pro- ■ cures a simultaneous appointm

Judges: Gray, Qounsel, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.