Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it irrelevant that the claimant refused to execute a “proposed stipulation to terminate the award”
• cabining Lam to situations where the “worker ‘neglected to comply with [a] notice requirement’ of the Act and the employer had not ‘flaunted the Commission’s requirements’ as prescribed by the rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).