Skip to main content
· 8/25/2011

Unigene Laboratories, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.

Citations

  • 655 F.3d 1352
  • 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1858
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17762
  • 2011 WL 3715557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he claimed invention is not obvious if a person of ordinary skill would not select and combine the prior art references to reach the claimed com- position or formulation.” (emphasis added)
  • “[T]he claimed invention is not obvious if a person of ordinary skill would not select and combine the prior art references to reach the claimed com- position or formulation.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Moore, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.