· 8/25/2011
Unigene Laboratories, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.
Citations
- 655 F.3d 1352
- 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1858
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17762
- 2011 WL 3715557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he claimed invention is not obvious if a person of ordinary skill would not select and combine the prior art references to reach the claimed com- position or formulation.” (emphasis added)
- “[T]he claimed invention is not obvious if a person of ordinary skill would not select and combine the prior art references to reach the claimed com- position or formulation.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Moore, O'Malley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.