Unigard Insurance v. Department of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding attorney named on FOIA request had standing but client did not because client’s name was not on the request
• “Nowhere in the letter of February 26, 1997 did Unigard’s counsel indicate that he represents Uni-gard or that he sought the information on Unigard’s behalf.... It was [counsel’s] responsibility to state that he made the request as Unigard’s counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).