Unifund CCR Partners v. Weaver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that argument first raised by summary judgment non-movant in post-judgment filing did not preserve argument for appeal
• holding that summary judgment motion put appellant on notice of deficiency of his response to requests for admissions; thus, appellant knew of his mistake before judgment but failed to respond, thereby waiving his right to challenge deemed admissions
• holding that summary judgment motion put appellant on notice of deficiency of his response to requests for admissions, and, thus, appellant knew of his mistake before judgment but failed to respond, thereby waiving his right to challenge deemed admissions
• stating that limitations is a defense that “must be asserted in a pleading”
• noting that the presumption may be rebutted by affidavit
• “[W]e do not consider factual assertions that appear solely in briefs and are not supported by the –8– record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).