Unified School District No. 259 v. Disability Rights Center of Kansas, (DRC)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the ‘voluntary cessation’ doctrine is inapplicable” where “future instances of wrongful behavior may be quite different than the complained-of example that has already ceased” (internal quotations omitted)
• dismissing appeal as moot where a school district sought declaratory judgment to affirm ability to refuse disclosure of student records from state agency only for state agency to withdraw request
• “Constitutional mootness doctrine is grounded in the Article III requirement that federal courts may only decide actual ongoing cases or controversies.” (quoting Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. Nat’l Indian Gaming Comm’n, 327 F.3d 1019, 1028 (10th Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).