Skip to main content

Unico v. Owen

Citations

  • 232 A.2d 405
  • 50 N.J. 101
  • 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 542
  • 1967 N.J. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • N.J.S.A. 12A:2-302 authorizes the court to refuse to enforce any consumer contract clause which it finds unconscionable
  • note holder who has knowledge of seller’s standardized contract may not be holder-in-due-course of consumer’s note because holder took note without good faith
  • N.J.S.A. 12A:2-302 authorizes the court to refuse to enforce any consumer contract clause which it finds unconscionable
  • note holder who has knowledge of seller's standardized contract may not be holder-in-due-course of consumer's note because holder took note without good faith
  • consumer sale of stereo and record album package; financier not holder in due course because not a good faith purchaser where it participated in the underlying transaction
  • “[Cjonsumer goods contracts and their concurrent financing arrangements should be construed most strictly against the seller ... and against the finance company which participated in the transaction, directly or indirectly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Unico v. Owen

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.