Skip to main content
· 7/1/1873

Unger v. Anderson's

Citations

  • 37 Tex. 550

Syllabus

<p>1. Suit on a joint and several promissory note was brought against appellant and two other makers of it. Appellant pleaded that he and one of his co-defendants were sureties for the third defendant. The court below allowed the plaintiff to dismiss as to the alleged principal and co-surety, without averring that they were dead, insolvent, or beyond the jurisdiction; after which, judgment was recovered against appellant. Held, error to allow the dismissal.</p> <p>2. A petition on a promissory note should aver the making and execution of the note, as well as the ownership of it.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the failure to raise constitutional claims of trial error on direct appeal precludes review of such claims in any further state court proceeding and thus results in a procedural default in the absence of rare and exceptional circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.