California Court of Appeal· 10/18/1943
Ungemach v. Ungemach
Citations
- 61 Cal. App. 2d 29
- 142 P.2d 99
- 1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The residence referred to in the [divorce-jurisdictionl statute is equivalent to domicile.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-14· cited 94×
- LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-11-21· cited 44×
- Aldabe v. AldabeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-11-09· cited 31×
- Del Ruth v. Del RuthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-08-01· cited 27×
- Tompkins v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-12-23· cited 26×
- Price v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-11-23· cited 24×
- In Re on Behalf of EnkeMontana Supreme Court· 1955-08-18· cited 22×
- McGann v. McGannCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-11-14· cited 21×
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-08-15· cited 20×
- Dowd v. DowdCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-06-19· cited 19×
- SENJAB VS. ALHULAIBI (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-10-21· cited 16×
- Serns v. SernsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-08-17· cited 15×
- Melny v. MelnyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-03-18· cited 14×
- Ruggles v. RugglesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-10-26· cited 12×
- Bixby v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-09-30· cited 12×
- In Re Marriage of ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-08-27· cited 12×
- Hellman v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-01-09· cited 10×
- Hayes v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-06-09· cited 10×
- Mauro v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-09-04· cited 10×
- Lucich v. LucichCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-09-03· cited 9×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-06-18· cited 88×
- Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-02-24· cited 49×
- Ryder v. RyderCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1934-11-26· cited 40×
- Keener v. KeenerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-08-19· cited 37×
- Fleming v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-07-27· cited 35×
- Kegley v. KegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-08-22· cited 33×
- Scheibe v. ScheibeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-02-26· cited 32×
- Cline v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-02-18· cited 17×
- Bilger v. BilgerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-10-06· cited 13×
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-03-17· cited 10×
- Bennett v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-10-15· cited 10×
- Bragg v. BraggCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-05-11· cited 8×
- Catsiftes v. CatsiftesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-11-15· cited 8×
- Eriksen v. EriksenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-03-05· cited 7×
- Palmanteer v. PalmanteerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1938-07-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.