Ungar v. Islamic Republic of Iran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “whether the absence of causation is a jurisdictional issue ... has not been decided by an appellate court and need not be decided here”
• finding that “[t]he absence of a clear link from the Iran-Hamas ‘partnership’ ” to the perpetrator of an attack was fatal to plaintiffs’ conspiracy theory
• rejecting the plaintiffs’ aiding and abetting argument where no evidence was presented showing the defendant’s assistance aided the underlying activity upon which liability was premised
• rejecting the plaintiffs’ aiding and abetting argument where no evidence was presented showing the defendant’s assistance aided the underlying activity upon which liability was premised
• dismissing aiding and abetting claim for failure to state a claim
• discussing requirements for establishing chain conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).