· 10/19/2006
Unfoldment, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board
Citations
- 909 A.2d 204
- 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 575
- 2006 WL 2970425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the language in question is unambiguous, its interpretation is a question of law for the court.”
- “A court must honor the intentions of the parties as reflected in the settled usage of the terms they accepted in the contract . . . .” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Farrell, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.