Skip to main content
· 10/19/2006

Unfoldment, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

Citations

  • 909 A.2d 204
  • 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 575
  • 2006 WL 2970425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where the language in question is unambiguous, its interpretation is a question of law for the court.”
  • “A court must honor the intentions of the parties as reflected in the settled usage of the terms they accepted in the contract . . . .” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Washington, Farrell, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.