U.N./F.A.O. World Food Programme v. M/V Tay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the statutory exception codified at 46 U.S.C. 1304(2)(q
• “The evidence supports the district court’s finding that the ABS had no influence over the selection of the terminal or the stevedore .... The district court was therefore entitled to conclude[ ] that the cargo was delivered when the ship opened the hatches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).