· 11/14/1972
Uneeda Doll Co., Inc. v. Regent Baby Products Corp.
Citations
- 355 F. Supp. 438
- 176 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 73
- 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the Merit Systems Protection Board, not the court, [has] exclusive jurisdiction over USERRA claims against the United States”
- “aesthetic impression is not the same . [n]or are the differences only such that an ordinary observer would be disposed to overlook them unless he set out to detect the disparities” but “fact of copying is plain.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dooling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.