Skip to main content
· 11/14/1972

Uneeda Doll Co., Inc. v. Regent Baby Products Corp.

Citations

  • 355 F. Supp. 438
  • 176 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 73
  • 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the Merit Systems Protection Board, not the court, [has] exclusive jurisdiction over USERRA claims against the United States”
  • “aesthetic impression is not the same . [n]or are the differences only such that an ordinary observer would be disposed to overlook them unless he set out to detect the disparities” but “fact of copying is plain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dooling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.