Underwood v. Select Tire, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that companies that sold and installed tires assumed a “duty of discovery and warning” when they made representations regarding a tire’s quality and fitness for use
• describing the general duty one owes to the world to not subject them to an unreasonable risk of harm
• truck owner relied on tire company’s tire inspection where he asked whether the tires were “good” and explained how he planned to use them, and tire company inspected the tires and 21 represented to the truck owner that they were fit for use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).