Skip to main content
· 11/21/1884

Un Wong v. Kan Chu

Citations

  • 5 Haw. 225
  • 1884 Haw. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The word ‘invention,‘ as used in the statute, implies that the product thereof, or the method or process by which the product is created, must be the result of a preformed idea embracing the article, or the method, as a definite conception of the mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Austin, Judd, McCully

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.