Umu Alhassan v. Abdul K. Yahaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court “is not equipped to act as auxiliary lawyer for a party,” particularly a represented party
• providing that the “court has no duty to research and construct legal arguments available to a party, especially when he is represented by counsel.” (citations omitted)
• deeming argument waived because litigant and attorney failed to cite case law or statutory authority
• “This court has no duty to research and construct legal arguments available to a party, especially when he is represented by counsel.”
• “This court has no duty to research and construct legal arguments available to a party.”
• The court “has no duty to research and construct legal arguments available to a party, especially when he is represented by counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).