Umpqua Bank v. Charles A. Gunzel III and Ginelle F. Gunzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that toy gun was not “weapon” under standard jury instruction 15.1 because there was no evidence defendant used it to strike victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).