· 4/5/2004
UMLIC VP LLC Ex Rel. United States v. Matthias
Citations
- 45 V.I. 786
- 364 F.3d 125
- 36 A.L.R. 6th 869
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the rule that a foreclosure action shares the statute of limitations of the underlying debt, and adopting the stance that even when a debt action is time barred, the mortgagee may proceed to foreclose
- “[F]ederal law supplies the statute of limitations in cases where the plaintiff is a successor in interest to 7 the United States.”
- “Doctrinally, an assignee stood in the shoes of the assignor at common law, and the Uniform Commercial Code provides that ‘[t]ransfer of an instrument . . . vests in the transferee any right of the transferor to enforce the instrument.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nygaard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.