Skip to main content
· 4/5/2004

UMLIC VP LLC Ex Rel. United States v. Matthias

Citations

  • 45 V.I. 786
  • 364 F.3d 125
  • 36 A.L.R. 6th 869
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the rule that a foreclosure action shares the statute of limitations of the underlying debt, and adopting the stance that even when a debt action is time barred, the mortgagee may proceed to foreclose
  • “[F]ederal law supplies the statute of limitations in cases where the plaintiff is a successor in interest to 7 the United States.”
  • “Doctrinally, an assignee stood in the shoes of the assignor at common law, and the Uniform Commercial Code provides that ‘[t]ransfer of an instrument . . . vests in the transferee any right of the transferor to enforce the instrument.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nygaard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.