Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a complaint’s allegations must be accepted as true, and read in the light most favorable to the plaintiff
• finding that appellant’s unjust enrichment claim regarding her employer’s wrongful collection of FICA taxes was preempted by § 7422
• finding that federal law preempted state-law claims for tax damages suffered because of misclassification
• reading FICA’s provisions into every employment contract would contradict Congress’s decision not to expressly include a private right of action
• reading FICA's provisions into every employment contract would contradict Congress's decision not to expressly include a private right of action
• dismissing state law claim that “at root” alleged violation of federal statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).