Skip to main content
· 3/1/1996

Umerley v. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY.

Citations

  • 672 A.2d 173
  • 108 Md. App. 497
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the Baltimore County Board’s grant of a variance because the board “ignore[d] the first prong of the variance test”
  • the fact that the applicants had used the property for a trucking facility before the County adopted the area regulations at issue did not make the property unique for purposes of a variance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Bishop, Eyler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.