· 3/1/1996
Umerley v. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY.
Citations
- 672 A.2d 173
- 108 Md. App. 497
- 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing the Baltimore County Board’s grant of a variance because the board “ignore[d] the first prong of the variance test”
- the fact that the applicants had used the property for a trucking facility before the County adopted the area regulations at issue did not make the property unique for purposes of a variance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Bishop, Eyler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.