· 10/15/2013
Umeh v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 464
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 311
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3216
- 571 U.S. 969
- 2013 WL 4985589
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prima facie case requires the petitioner to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success
- noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
- noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
- noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
- noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
- remanding de- spite a prior adverse credibility finding where the motion to reopen presented a distinct factual predicate from the prior claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.