Skip to main content
· 10/15/2013

Umeh v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 464
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 311
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3216
  • 571 U.S. 969
  • 2013 WL 4985589
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prima facie case requires the petitioner to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success
  • noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
  • noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
  • noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
  • noting that the Board need not “forget the prior credibility finding” but granting the petition for review where the Board failed “to engage with the new evidence”
  • remanding de- spite a prior adverse credibility finding where the motion to reopen presented a distinct factual predicate from the prior claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.