Ultra Petro Corp v. Ad Hoc Com

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]ere suspicions are inadequate to support a claim for tortious interference with [prospective economic advantage].”
• same for claims for tor- tious interference with prospective business relations (citations omitted)
• “As federal courts applying New York law have recognized, conduct constituting tortious interference with business relations is, by definition, conduct directed not at the plaintiff itself, but at the party with which the plaintiff has or seeks to have a relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).