Ulstein Maritime, Ltd. And Schottel of America, Inc. v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “language such as that in § 634(b)(1) was added to enabling statutes to bar the attachment of agency funds and other interference with agency functioning”
• “Some courts have read the wording in this way, and concluded that all injunctive relief directed at the SBA is absolutely prohibited.”
• “The no-injunction language [of section 634(b)] protects the agency from interference with its internal workings by judicial orders attaching agency funds, etc., but does not provide blanket immunity from every type of injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).